Download high-resolution image
Listen to a clip from the audiobook
audio pause button
0:00
0:00

Searches

Selfhood in the Digital Age

Author Vauhini Vara On Tour
Listen to a clip from the audiobook
audio pause button
0:00
0:00
From the author of The Immortal King Rao, finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, a personal exploration of how technology companies have both fulfilled and exploited the human desire for understanding and connection • A MOST ANTICIPATED BOOK: Esquire, Foreign Policy, Lit Hub, Electric Literature

When it was released to the public in November 2022, ChatGPT awakened the world to a secretive project: teaching AI-powered machines to write. Its creators had a sweeping ambition—to build machines that could not only communicate, but could do all kinds of other activities, better than humans ever could. But was this goal actually achievable? And if reached, would it lead to our liberation or our subjugation?

Vauhini Vara, an award-winning tech journalist and editor, had long been grappling with these questions. In 2021, she asked a predecessor of ChatGPT to write about her sister’s death, resulting in an essay that was both more moving and more disturbing than she could have imagined. It quickly went viral.

The experience, revealing both the power and the danger of corporate-owned technologies, forced Vara to interrogate how these technologies have influenced her understanding of her self and the world around her, from discovering online chat rooms as a preteen, to using social media as the Wall Street Journal’s first Facebook reporter, to asking ChatGPT for writing advice—while compelling her to add to the trove of human-created material exploited for corporations’ financial gain. Interspersed throughout this investigation are her own Google searches, Amazon reviews, and the other raw material of internet life—including the viral AI experiment that started it all. Searches illuminates how technological capitalism is both shaping and exploiting human existence, while proposing that by harnessing the collective creativity that makes humans unique, we might imagine a freer, more empowered relationship with our machines and, ultimately, with one another.

*Includes a downloadable PDF of images from the book
Chapter 1

Your Whole Life Will Be Searchable

I first encountered the internet at the home of a girl from school whose parents were acquaintances of my parents. This was in the early 1990s, in a well-off suburb of Oklahoma City called Edmond. I remember the girl’s name well, but it feels unfair to share it; I’ll call her Lily Zhang. Lily steered me to a room away from our parents with a beige desktop computer. She typed some characters and tapped the mouse, and the computer burst into a long, staticky screech, punctuated by a series of sharp beeps, as if the machine were hyperventilating.

It was an anxiety-provoking sound, at an anxiety-provoking time in my life. I was eleven, twelve. We had recently moved to Edmond from Saskatchewan, Canada, the prairie province where I’d been born and raised. My dad, a doctor, had enrolled in a program at a nearby university to specialize as an occupational physician—part of a plan to relocate our family to the United States, where we could secure more promising futures than the ones available in Saskatchewan. I’d been through elementary school with the same classmates, kind Canadian boys and girls who treated my high self-regard, considering the circumstances (bad skin, social obliviousness, tender sensitivity to schoolyard injuries, overenthusiasm about math exams), with gentle forbearance. Because of this, I hadn’t understood, upon arriving in Edmond, that I was fated to be a social outcast there, and so, it was only when I walked up to the prettiest girls in the sixth grade and sat with them, admiring the gloss on their full, smooth lips, expecting to be invited to be friends, and they only subtly shifted their bodies so that I was no longer in their line of sight, as did many others over the following weeks, that I, for the first time in my life, became aware of my own shortcomings in the eyes of other human beings. My body itself offended—not just my brown and eczematous skin, but also my quarter-inch-thick glasses and my tummy-first way of moving through the world—even before I opened my mouth.

By the time of the invitation to Lily’s house, I had a stronger sense of the social hierarchy of Central Middle School and, in turn, had grown more modest in my self-presentation, though my internal self-esteem hadn’t waned. Lily also occupied a lowly rank but outwardly displayed major confidence, for which I judged her. Her loud, slightly arrogant voice. The way she hogged the keyboard, conveying pride of ownership. All projection on my part, in retrospect. It was in this context that when the modem’s shrieking gave way to silence, and Lily introduced me to my first America Online chat room, in which strangers from all over the world could meet other strangers, each human being manifesting on-screen only as their chosen screen name, everyone’s messages jostling democratically against everyone else’s in the same index card–sized window, I found myself utterly enchanted. This was, I thought, the most exciting invention I had seen in my life.

This period had a name: the Eternal September. In the formative years of the internet, in the 1980s and early 1990s, old-school internet users who hung out on message boards would get irritated every September when freshmen showed up at universities, received their campus-based internet accounts for the first time, and flooded the message boards. “They would use them to, among other things, download naughty images,” Jay Furr, an early internet user, told me. In 1989, the British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee, working at a European institution called CERN, had invented the World Wide Web, a global information system that involved using browsers to open hyperlinked documents. Then, in April 1993, CERN decided to make its World Wide Web source code freely available. Suddenly internet traffic swelled, with companies like America Online coming along to capitalize on it. “The thing that brought about the ‘Eternal September’ was the availability of commercial Internet access,” Furr told me. For a fee, these companies would connect you to the internet through your phone line. If someone else in your house tried to make a call while you were online, you’d get disconnected without warning.

America Online started a direct-mail campaign sending floppy disks and CDs to people’s homes, offering some free hours of internet use if people signed up. “POP this FREE software in your computer for 10 FREE hours online!” one promotional mailing read. When the trial ran out, America Online charged a fixed amount—at one point, $9.95 for five hours of monthly internet access, with an option for “heavy users” to buy more time, for $2.95 an hour. That campaign was maybe as important as the opening of the World Wide Web’s source code in getting people using the internet. It’s how Lily Zhang’s parents must have gotten online. Soon after my first exposure to AOL in Lily’s house, my parents also bought a subscription, as did millions of others across the United States and, eventually, the world.

If you were alive then, you might have first gone online around this time, too. When you signed in to AOL, a screen would pop up with buttons and links to various services, like email, weather information, and those chat rooms. You might remember the chat rooms. We might have been in the same ones. Chat rooms were one of the most popular aspects of AOL, which didn’t yet include a browser for visiting websites. As I recall, my favorite magazine, Seventeen, had its own room, where this one girl reigned. I recall that she was, appropriately, seventeen. She was a redhead; I recall that, too, because of the particulars of the redness of her hair, which we were meant to understand naturally had the same red color as a cherry or a chili pepper. I don’t recall her name, but it was hot, something like Chloe. Chloe would hold court in the room, advising the rest of us, mostly about how to be hotter. Sometimes one of us would ask her to join us in a private chat room so that we could get more personal—share our specific hotness needs and have a more intimate conversation about them. Because she was sought after and not often available, the few times she accepted my invitations, appearing with me in a separate one-on-one square, I felt a tiny jolt of excitement. I pictured her as Jessica Rabbit.

Unfortunately, her advice usually felt wrong for me; she gave it on the false understanding that I possessed a baseline level of existing hotness on which she could build, when in fact my hotness was negative. In normal life, I tried not to draw attention to this, but on the internet I felt more honest. You don’t understand, I’d explain to Chloe, because you’re already hot. She’d respond that her lessons were less about physical appearance than about performance; you could make yourself attractive by speaking or walking in a certain way, she believed, baseline hotness notwithstanding. That was, I told her, exactly the sort of thing a hot girl would believe.

At some point, people in the Seventeen chat room started expressing doubts about whether Chloe was being honest about herself. I remember being shocked at the implication—that our empress would deceive her people! It was the particular redness of her hair that brought me around to the possibility. At the very least, I thought, she had to have dyed it. Yet while Chloe’s credibility was questionable, she was pretty much all we had then.

In 1992, there had been ten websites in the world; by 1993, there were 130. In August 1993—four months after the opening of the World Wide Web source code—a publisher of technical manuals named Tim O’Reilly announced that he was launching “a free Internet-based information center” called the Global Network Navigator. The information center, refreshed quarterly, would include news updates; a magazine with articles, columns, and “reviews of the Internet’s most interesting resources”; and, notably, a “marketplace” in which companies could pay to appear. O’Reilly’s information center would later come to be known as the world’s first commercial website. In May 1994, an interviewer asked O’Reilly, “What makes you think that people are gonna actually want to go in and look at advertisements?” He answered that they were already doing so. When some people think of the internet, he explained, they reflexively assume that commercial information is undesirable. “But it’s all information and people want it,” he said. “Particularly if you’re interested in a particular subject, commercial information may be what you want more than the stuff that’s there for free.” In fact, he said, people visited the marketplace section of his information center more often than they visited the magazine section with in-depth articles. “Because they want commercial information.”

The summer before I started the eighth grade, my family moved again, this time to a suburb of Seattle; my dad had gotten a job as an occupational physician at the Boeing Company. It was 1995. By then, browsers had replaced AOL-style portals as the favored way to navigate the internet. From there, search engines had emerged. We were listening to the Spice Girls, TLC, Alanis Morissette. Bill Clinton was president; under him, the White House had created a website for the first time. In February 1996, Clinton signed the Communications Decency Act, meant to regulate information-sharing on the internet by criminalizing the transmission of obscene, indecent, and offensive material online under certain circumstances. The prospect of regulation rankled some people. One of them, a Grateful Dead lyricist and internet activist named John Perry Barlow, wrote a manifesto proclaiming that government wasn’t welcome in this space: “We are creating a world that all may enter without privilege or prejudice accorded by race, economic power, military force, or station of birth. We are creating a world where anyone, anywhere may express his or her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity.” That perspective caught on, with some of the earliest internet executives amplifying the cause alongside free-speech activists. By 1997, the Supreme Court had struck down the law’s provisions about dirty talk—it’s farthest-reaching legacy would arguably end up being Section 230, protecting online platforms from being held liable for what their users post—and Clinton had turned his focus to supporting the internet’s “explosive potential for prosperity,” declaring that the best path forward for the government was to “not to stand in the way, to do no harm.”

Chat rooms had prepared us for what the internet was becoming—a place where, anonymized and disembodied, we could seek answers to our truest questions. The earliest search engines, of which Yahoo was the most popular, were directories: a column or two of hyperlinks naming broad subjects (entertainment, science, and so on), within which more columns were nested. In a search box, you would type what you were looking for and be taken to a list of relevant pages. There was a lot, at the time, that I was looking for. For one thing, moving from Oklahoma to Washington had not solved my hotness-related problems. My earliest searches were for information about my troubled skin. My face, especially at my hairline and above my lip, was perpetually covered in a layer of dry grayish patches that I had a habit of picking and peeling until they came loose, exposing the raw layer underneath. For this, a boy in our apartment complex had nicknamed me Crusty. I couldn’t bear to ask anyone about my skin; even with the dermatologists my parents took me to, I had a habit of pretending I thought it looked fine. But Yahoo felt like a safe space, one in which judgment was impossible. I searched for “eczema”; I searched for “psoriasis.” Maybe I searched for “crusty skin.”

The next year—my freshman year of high school—my older sister, Deepa, was diagnosed with a type of cancer called Ewing sarcoma. She was in her junior year. A lump had been growing on her arm; our family doctor misdiagnosed it for a while before sending her for the scans that revealed the truth. Immediately, she was admitted to Seattle Children’s Hospital to start an aggressive course of chemotherapy that would keep her in and out of the hospital—for both the treatment and the invariable side effects and complications—for months. When she stayed overnight, which was common, one parent would sleep at the hospital with her, while the other would be at home with me. On my visits after school, we watched Friends or played cards or, if she wasn’t feeling well, just sat around. Her friends came often, as did her teachers. She had a straight-A average that she didn’t want to let slip—she dreamed of being valedictorian—so she would study in bed at the hospital, with her teachers stopping by to administer her exams. At one point, she went into remission, and the Make-A-Wish Foundation paid for her and her friends to visit New York, with her friends’ moms as chaperones. They took photos of themselves posing around the city in tank tops and little skirts. She graduated as a valedictorian of our high school, as planned, and started her freshman year at Duke.

Then her cancer returned, and she flew home and started treatment again. Sometimes she worried aloud that she would die, in response to which I would go cold and unresponsive. My sister’s cancer, even more than my skin, was a subject about which disclosure of my own fears was impossible. My sister—my bold, buoyant sister—was my personal deity. She had always been unapologetically open about her feelings and convictions, while I had always been guarded. I was a superstitious kid, avoidant of sidewalk cracks and black cats, a kid who slept facedown to avoid exposing my neck to vampires. I harbored a vague terror that naming my fears out loud would make them come true. So instead, I went to Yahoo with them. I thought Yahoo could tell me, specifically, the chances that my sister would die. I used the baroque, quotation-mark-heavy syntax common at the time—“ewing sarcoma” and “death,” “ewing sarcoma” and “prognosis”—but came up blank. I never did get up the nerve to take the question to a human being who might be able to answer.
“Vara journeys through the evolution of the internet, ethical quandaries surrounding AI, and her own life with her characteristically piercing, yet unadorned prose. . . . at once genre-defying and gripping.”The Washington Post

“A complicated and many-sided book. . . . Searches has many things to recommend it. Vara has a congenial style and, her nose to the zeitgeist, good stories to tell.”—Dwight Garner, The New York Times

“Vara hasn’t lost her journalist edge, as she shows throughout this book . . . Searches is as discomfiting as it is entertaining, with Vara exercising playful technique as a writer while also laying down dire warnings about a tech-dominated future. It’s also a clear reminder that, at least for now, nothing can make language sing like a gifted human mind.”Harper’s Magazine

“In a growing lineage of books critiquing the power that tech titans wield over our physical world, Searches stands out for emphasizing how they’ve also shaped our private psychological terrain. Vara treats her own life as a vehicle to recount the disquieting history of the internet—or perhaps the other way around. . . . This seamless blend of personal narrative and systemic critique parallels Vara’s subject: technology that has made it feel impossible to compose a self and a society without it.”The Atlantic

“Vara is an appealing narrator—smart, funny, honest.”The New Yorker

“Vara consistently applies her own deliberate curiosity to the implications of innovation. Crucially, she brings a gimlet eye, sharpened by her journalism background, to the enthusiastic claims of technology evangelists. . . . In the face of all the technology, Searches’ least mediated observations remain its most haunting.”Alta

“[Vara] is equipped to take on these issues to an almost uncanny degree. . . . Searches is as discomfiting as it is entertaining, with Vara exercising playful technique as a writer while also laying down dire warnings about a tech-dominated future. It’s also a clear reminder that, at least for now, nothing can make language sing like a gifted human mind.”San Francisco Chronicle

“A thought-provoking investigation into personal history, creativity, and technology, elements that make us all.”Alta

“Vara urges readers to think about the digital landscape in new and challenging ways.”Bustle

“Thought-provoking, accessible and compelling. . . . Will have you questioning what you thought you knew about technology in the 21st century.”Ms. Magazine

“A masterful memoir written with the precision of a journalist and skills of a creative writer—both of which Vara is—and framed as a conversation with ChatGPT, Searches . . . takes us on an astonishing journey that shocks us from time to time with how little we know about tech, how much tech knows about us, and how much more there is for all of us to know and learn.”—PEN, “The PEN Ten”

“Timely and necessary. . . . Ultimately, this book asks us to engage in the big questions and to ask what makes us human and if we are letting machines and capitalism engulf our humanity.”International Examiner

“[Vara] invites us to pause and reflect on the agency we still possess in these the late stages of global capitalism, and to imagine alternative, hopeful futures. . . . While her background as a top-tier tech journalist gives the book an air of authority, Vara’s skills as a novelist (The Immortal King Rao, a 2023 Pulitzer finalist) are what bring Searches to life.”Rocky Mountain Reader

“Provocative. . . . Vara examines the allure and risks of AI-powered communication — questioning whether these tools will liberate us or further exploit our voices.”Denizen

“Readers will be profoundly moved by this remarkable meditation.”Publishers Weekly, starred review

“Tragic, funny, and relatable[, Searches] is by turns absurd and insightful, engaging with the ethics of algorithms, surveillance, and privacy in a meaningful way. . . . A must read.”Library Journal, starred review

“Vara’s essays are beautifully written and profoundly researched, but what sets them apart is their profound vulnerability. Her use of experimental forms . . . pushes the limits of the genre without ever compromising her circumspective, confessional approach. An original essay collection about loss, technology, morality, and identity.”Kirkus, starred review

“Vara humanizes the influence of technology in highly personal terms [and] projects what the future holds as tech oligarchs gain political influence. . . . Provocative, challenging, and concerning, Vara’s clever, eye-opening approach brings home the often uneasy confluence of individual desire, social benefits, and corporate ambition.” Booklist, starred review

“A book of essays in the original sense, which is to say that it is a book of experiments, of interrogations: of the internet, of form, of possibilities, of ourselves.”—LitHub, “Most Anticipated Books of 2025”

"Searches is that rare thing: a genuinely thrilling book that breaks open existing forms and structures to offer something entirely new. Vara brings the rigor of a reporter and the exhilarating impulses of an artist into this extraordinary, sui generis book: with wit, insight, tenderness, humility, and clear-eyed candor, she explores the wild frontiers of what our lives have already become. The stakes are high. The ride is terrifying and illuminating at once. This book will leave you changed and stay with you for good."—Leslie Jamison, author of Splinters: Another Kind of Love Story

"I cannot imagine a better guide through the infuriating, labyrinthine underworld of technology than Vauhini Vara. Searches is so many things—heart-stoppingly sad, a formal high-wire act, a wise and funny and thoughtful encyclopedia of our modern age—but most of all it is a book about human relationships: how imperfectly we made this thing that connects us, and how we might use this thing to re-meet ourselves and each other."— Carmen Maria Machado, author of In the Dream House

“What an original, expansive, epic achievement. I've been waiting for a follow-up to Vauhini Vara's magazine piece ‘Ghosts,’ where she introduced us to a new machine-based technology — a predecessor to ChatGPT — that had the potential to replace writers like herself. What she's delivered in Searches is a riveting, provocative and deeply personal exploration of our ambivalent relationship with technology that spans from our earliest history to the advent of the internet to the race to dominate artificial intelligence. This is a book that will challenge your notions of what it means to be human, investigating our quest for connection and understanding of our place in the world when technology is getting devilishly good at mimicking us. There is no one better to tell this story than Vauhini Vara, with her deeply engaging personal narratives, infused with curiosity and humor, who has grown up with the internet and sat in the front row as the captains of Big Tech brought us the technologies that now permeate our lives. This book doesn't lead you to a simple and automatic conclusion. In perhaps the most human of qualities, it will make you continue to question, to search.”— Cecilia Kang, co-author of An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook’s Battle for Domination and award-winning New York Times technology and policy reporter

“Searches picks up where Vauhini Vara’s impressive first novel, The Immortal King Rao, left off; this new book deepens, complicates, and amplifies her ongoing investigation into the nature of artificial intelligence, especially in relationship to the human body, mortality, sorrow, and grief. Blessedly free of cant or posture and extremely knowledgeable about (and acutely conscious of its complicity in) the networks it’s mapping, Searches is Vara’s best and most compelling book yet.”—David Shields, author of Reality Hunger

In Searches, the novelist Vauhini Vara gives us a thought-provoking exploration of our age of digital networks and AI. A seemingly omnipresent observer of this revolution, she takes us on a journey from middle-school chat rooms in 1990s Oklahoma, to an early, pre-OpenAI interview with Sam Altman, to her wary interactions with the then-new, not-yet-public AI model GPT-3 as she seeks to make sense of a youthful trauma that won’t go away. Searches defies simple, familiar narrative at every turn, rendering a compelling warning of how our technology both connects and commodifies us, molding our understanding of our world and ourselves.”­—David A. Price, author of Geniuses at War and The Pixar Touch
© Brigid McAuliffe
Vauhini Vara has been a reporter and editor for The Atlantic, The New Yorker, and the New York Times Magazine, and is the prize-winning author of The Immortal King Rao and This is Salvaged. She lives in Fort Collins, Colorado. View titles by Vauhini Vara

About

From the author of The Immortal King Rao, finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, a personal exploration of how technology companies have both fulfilled and exploited the human desire for understanding and connection • A MOST ANTICIPATED BOOK: Esquire, Foreign Policy, Lit Hub, Electric Literature

When it was released to the public in November 2022, ChatGPT awakened the world to a secretive project: teaching AI-powered machines to write. Its creators had a sweeping ambition—to build machines that could not only communicate, but could do all kinds of other activities, better than humans ever could. But was this goal actually achievable? And if reached, would it lead to our liberation or our subjugation?

Vauhini Vara, an award-winning tech journalist and editor, had long been grappling with these questions. In 2021, she asked a predecessor of ChatGPT to write about her sister’s death, resulting in an essay that was both more moving and more disturbing than she could have imagined. It quickly went viral.

The experience, revealing both the power and the danger of corporate-owned technologies, forced Vara to interrogate how these technologies have influenced her understanding of her self and the world around her, from discovering online chat rooms as a preteen, to using social media as the Wall Street Journal’s first Facebook reporter, to asking ChatGPT for writing advice—while compelling her to add to the trove of human-created material exploited for corporations’ financial gain. Interspersed throughout this investigation are her own Google searches, Amazon reviews, and the other raw material of internet life—including the viral AI experiment that started it all. Searches illuminates how technological capitalism is both shaping and exploiting human existence, while proposing that by harnessing the collective creativity that makes humans unique, we might imagine a freer, more empowered relationship with our machines and, ultimately, with one another.

*Includes a downloadable PDF of images from the book

Excerpt

Chapter 1

Your Whole Life Will Be Searchable

I first encountered the internet at the home of a girl from school whose parents were acquaintances of my parents. This was in the early 1990s, in a well-off suburb of Oklahoma City called Edmond. I remember the girl’s name well, but it feels unfair to share it; I’ll call her Lily Zhang. Lily steered me to a room away from our parents with a beige desktop computer. She typed some characters and tapped the mouse, and the computer burst into a long, staticky screech, punctuated by a series of sharp beeps, as if the machine were hyperventilating.

It was an anxiety-provoking sound, at an anxiety-provoking time in my life. I was eleven, twelve. We had recently moved to Edmond from Saskatchewan, Canada, the prairie province where I’d been born and raised. My dad, a doctor, had enrolled in a program at a nearby university to specialize as an occupational physician—part of a plan to relocate our family to the United States, where we could secure more promising futures than the ones available in Saskatchewan. I’d been through elementary school with the same classmates, kind Canadian boys and girls who treated my high self-regard, considering the circumstances (bad skin, social obliviousness, tender sensitivity to schoolyard injuries, overenthusiasm about math exams), with gentle forbearance. Because of this, I hadn’t understood, upon arriving in Edmond, that I was fated to be a social outcast there, and so, it was only when I walked up to the prettiest girls in the sixth grade and sat with them, admiring the gloss on their full, smooth lips, expecting to be invited to be friends, and they only subtly shifted their bodies so that I was no longer in their line of sight, as did many others over the following weeks, that I, for the first time in my life, became aware of my own shortcomings in the eyes of other human beings. My body itself offended—not just my brown and eczematous skin, but also my quarter-inch-thick glasses and my tummy-first way of moving through the world—even before I opened my mouth.

By the time of the invitation to Lily’s house, I had a stronger sense of the social hierarchy of Central Middle School and, in turn, had grown more modest in my self-presentation, though my internal self-esteem hadn’t waned. Lily also occupied a lowly rank but outwardly displayed major confidence, for which I judged her. Her loud, slightly arrogant voice. The way she hogged the keyboard, conveying pride of ownership. All projection on my part, in retrospect. It was in this context that when the modem’s shrieking gave way to silence, and Lily introduced me to my first America Online chat room, in which strangers from all over the world could meet other strangers, each human being manifesting on-screen only as their chosen screen name, everyone’s messages jostling democratically against everyone else’s in the same index card–sized window, I found myself utterly enchanted. This was, I thought, the most exciting invention I had seen in my life.

This period had a name: the Eternal September. In the formative years of the internet, in the 1980s and early 1990s, old-school internet users who hung out on message boards would get irritated every September when freshmen showed up at universities, received their campus-based internet accounts for the first time, and flooded the message boards. “They would use them to, among other things, download naughty images,” Jay Furr, an early internet user, told me. In 1989, the British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee, working at a European institution called CERN, had invented the World Wide Web, a global information system that involved using browsers to open hyperlinked documents. Then, in April 1993, CERN decided to make its World Wide Web source code freely available. Suddenly internet traffic swelled, with companies like America Online coming along to capitalize on it. “The thing that brought about the ‘Eternal September’ was the availability of commercial Internet access,” Furr told me. For a fee, these companies would connect you to the internet through your phone line. If someone else in your house tried to make a call while you were online, you’d get disconnected without warning.

America Online started a direct-mail campaign sending floppy disks and CDs to people’s homes, offering some free hours of internet use if people signed up. “POP this FREE software in your computer for 10 FREE hours online!” one promotional mailing read. When the trial ran out, America Online charged a fixed amount—at one point, $9.95 for five hours of monthly internet access, with an option for “heavy users” to buy more time, for $2.95 an hour. That campaign was maybe as important as the opening of the World Wide Web’s source code in getting people using the internet. It’s how Lily Zhang’s parents must have gotten online. Soon after my first exposure to AOL in Lily’s house, my parents also bought a subscription, as did millions of others across the United States and, eventually, the world.

If you were alive then, you might have first gone online around this time, too. When you signed in to AOL, a screen would pop up with buttons and links to various services, like email, weather information, and those chat rooms. You might remember the chat rooms. We might have been in the same ones. Chat rooms were one of the most popular aspects of AOL, which didn’t yet include a browser for visiting websites. As I recall, my favorite magazine, Seventeen, had its own room, where this one girl reigned. I recall that she was, appropriately, seventeen. She was a redhead; I recall that, too, because of the particulars of the redness of her hair, which we were meant to understand naturally had the same red color as a cherry or a chili pepper. I don’t recall her name, but it was hot, something like Chloe. Chloe would hold court in the room, advising the rest of us, mostly about how to be hotter. Sometimes one of us would ask her to join us in a private chat room so that we could get more personal—share our specific hotness needs and have a more intimate conversation about them. Because she was sought after and not often available, the few times she accepted my invitations, appearing with me in a separate one-on-one square, I felt a tiny jolt of excitement. I pictured her as Jessica Rabbit.

Unfortunately, her advice usually felt wrong for me; she gave it on the false understanding that I possessed a baseline level of existing hotness on which she could build, when in fact my hotness was negative. In normal life, I tried not to draw attention to this, but on the internet I felt more honest. You don’t understand, I’d explain to Chloe, because you’re already hot. She’d respond that her lessons were less about physical appearance than about performance; you could make yourself attractive by speaking or walking in a certain way, she believed, baseline hotness notwithstanding. That was, I told her, exactly the sort of thing a hot girl would believe.

At some point, people in the Seventeen chat room started expressing doubts about whether Chloe was being honest about herself. I remember being shocked at the implication—that our empress would deceive her people! It was the particular redness of her hair that brought me around to the possibility. At the very least, I thought, she had to have dyed it. Yet while Chloe’s credibility was questionable, she was pretty much all we had then.

In 1992, there had been ten websites in the world; by 1993, there were 130. In August 1993—four months after the opening of the World Wide Web source code—a publisher of technical manuals named Tim O’Reilly announced that he was launching “a free Internet-based information center” called the Global Network Navigator. The information center, refreshed quarterly, would include news updates; a magazine with articles, columns, and “reviews of the Internet’s most interesting resources”; and, notably, a “marketplace” in which companies could pay to appear. O’Reilly’s information center would later come to be known as the world’s first commercial website. In May 1994, an interviewer asked O’Reilly, “What makes you think that people are gonna actually want to go in and look at advertisements?” He answered that they were already doing so. When some people think of the internet, he explained, they reflexively assume that commercial information is undesirable. “But it’s all information and people want it,” he said. “Particularly if you’re interested in a particular subject, commercial information may be what you want more than the stuff that’s there for free.” In fact, he said, people visited the marketplace section of his information center more often than they visited the magazine section with in-depth articles. “Because they want commercial information.”

The summer before I started the eighth grade, my family moved again, this time to a suburb of Seattle; my dad had gotten a job as an occupational physician at the Boeing Company. It was 1995. By then, browsers had replaced AOL-style portals as the favored way to navigate the internet. From there, search engines had emerged. We were listening to the Spice Girls, TLC, Alanis Morissette. Bill Clinton was president; under him, the White House had created a website for the first time. In February 1996, Clinton signed the Communications Decency Act, meant to regulate information-sharing on the internet by criminalizing the transmission of obscene, indecent, and offensive material online under certain circumstances. The prospect of regulation rankled some people. One of them, a Grateful Dead lyricist and internet activist named John Perry Barlow, wrote a manifesto proclaiming that government wasn’t welcome in this space: “We are creating a world that all may enter without privilege or prejudice accorded by race, economic power, military force, or station of birth. We are creating a world where anyone, anywhere may express his or her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity.” That perspective caught on, with some of the earliest internet executives amplifying the cause alongside free-speech activists. By 1997, the Supreme Court had struck down the law’s provisions about dirty talk—it’s farthest-reaching legacy would arguably end up being Section 230, protecting online platforms from being held liable for what their users post—and Clinton had turned his focus to supporting the internet’s “explosive potential for prosperity,” declaring that the best path forward for the government was to “not to stand in the way, to do no harm.”

Chat rooms had prepared us for what the internet was becoming—a place where, anonymized and disembodied, we could seek answers to our truest questions. The earliest search engines, of which Yahoo was the most popular, were directories: a column or two of hyperlinks naming broad subjects (entertainment, science, and so on), within which more columns were nested. In a search box, you would type what you were looking for and be taken to a list of relevant pages. There was a lot, at the time, that I was looking for. For one thing, moving from Oklahoma to Washington had not solved my hotness-related problems. My earliest searches were for information about my troubled skin. My face, especially at my hairline and above my lip, was perpetually covered in a layer of dry grayish patches that I had a habit of picking and peeling until they came loose, exposing the raw layer underneath. For this, a boy in our apartment complex had nicknamed me Crusty. I couldn’t bear to ask anyone about my skin; even with the dermatologists my parents took me to, I had a habit of pretending I thought it looked fine. But Yahoo felt like a safe space, one in which judgment was impossible. I searched for “eczema”; I searched for “psoriasis.” Maybe I searched for “crusty skin.”

The next year—my freshman year of high school—my older sister, Deepa, was diagnosed with a type of cancer called Ewing sarcoma. She was in her junior year. A lump had been growing on her arm; our family doctor misdiagnosed it for a while before sending her for the scans that revealed the truth. Immediately, she was admitted to Seattle Children’s Hospital to start an aggressive course of chemotherapy that would keep her in and out of the hospital—for both the treatment and the invariable side effects and complications—for months. When she stayed overnight, which was common, one parent would sleep at the hospital with her, while the other would be at home with me. On my visits after school, we watched Friends or played cards or, if she wasn’t feeling well, just sat around. Her friends came often, as did her teachers. She had a straight-A average that she didn’t want to let slip—she dreamed of being valedictorian—so she would study in bed at the hospital, with her teachers stopping by to administer her exams. At one point, she went into remission, and the Make-A-Wish Foundation paid for her and her friends to visit New York, with her friends’ moms as chaperones. They took photos of themselves posing around the city in tank tops and little skirts. She graduated as a valedictorian of our high school, as planned, and started her freshman year at Duke.

Then her cancer returned, and she flew home and started treatment again. Sometimes she worried aloud that she would die, in response to which I would go cold and unresponsive. My sister’s cancer, even more than my skin, was a subject about which disclosure of my own fears was impossible. My sister—my bold, buoyant sister—was my personal deity. She had always been unapologetically open about her feelings and convictions, while I had always been guarded. I was a superstitious kid, avoidant of sidewalk cracks and black cats, a kid who slept facedown to avoid exposing my neck to vampires. I harbored a vague terror that naming my fears out loud would make them come true. So instead, I went to Yahoo with them. I thought Yahoo could tell me, specifically, the chances that my sister would die. I used the baroque, quotation-mark-heavy syntax common at the time—“ewing sarcoma” and “death,” “ewing sarcoma” and “prognosis”—but came up blank. I never did get up the nerve to take the question to a human being who might be able to answer.

Reviews

“Vara journeys through the evolution of the internet, ethical quandaries surrounding AI, and her own life with her characteristically piercing, yet unadorned prose. . . . at once genre-defying and gripping.”The Washington Post

“A complicated and many-sided book. . . . Searches has many things to recommend it. Vara has a congenial style and, her nose to the zeitgeist, good stories to tell.”—Dwight Garner, The New York Times

“Vara hasn’t lost her journalist edge, as she shows throughout this book . . . Searches is as discomfiting as it is entertaining, with Vara exercising playful technique as a writer while also laying down dire warnings about a tech-dominated future. It’s also a clear reminder that, at least for now, nothing can make language sing like a gifted human mind.”Harper’s Magazine

“In a growing lineage of books critiquing the power that tech titans wield over our physical world, Searches stands out for emphasizing how they’ve also shaped our private psychological terrain. Vara treats her own life as a vehicle to recount the disquieting history of the internet—or perhaps the other way around. . . . This seamless blend of personal narrative and systemic critique parallels Vara’s subject: technology that has made it feel impossible to compose a self and a society without it.”The Atlantic

“Vara is an appealing narrator—smart, funny, honest.”The New Yorker

“Vara consistently applies her own deliberate curiosity to the implications of innovation. Crucially, she brings a gimlet eye, sharpened by her journalism background, to the enthusiastic claims of technology evangelists. . . . In the face of all the technology, Searches’ least mediated observations remain its most haunting.”Alta

“[Vara] is equipped to take on these issues to an almost uncanny degree. . . . Searches is as discomfiting as it is entertaining, with Vara exercising playful technique as a writer while also laying down dire warnings about a tech-dominated future. It’s also a clear reminder that, at least for now, nothing can make language sing like a gifted human mind.”San Francisco Chronicle

“A thought-provoking investigation into personal history, creativity, and technology, elements that make us all.”Alta

“Vara urges readers to think about the digital landscape in new and challenging ways.”Bustle

“Thought-provoking, accessible and compelling. . . . Will have you questioning what you thought you knew about technology in the 21st century.”Ms. Magazine

“A masterful memoir written with the precision of a journalist and skills of a creative writer—both of which Vara is—and framed as a conversation with ChatGPT, Searches . . . takes us on an astonishing journey that shocks us from time to time with how little we know about tech, how much tech knows about us, and how much more there is for all of us to know and learn.”—PEN, “The PEN Ten”

“Timely and necessary. . . . Ultimately, this book asks us to engage in the big questions and to ask what makes us human and if we are letting machines and capitalism engulf our humanity.”International Examiner

“[Vara] invites us to pause and reflect on the agency we still possess in these the late stages of global capitalism, and to imagine alternative, hopeful futures. . . . While her background as a top-tier tech journalist gives the book an air of authority, Vara’s skills as a novelist (The Immortal King Rao, a 2023 Pulitzer finalist) are what bring Searches to life.”Rocky Mountain Reader

“Provocative. . . . Vara examines the allure and risks of AI-powered communication — questioning whether these tools will liberate us or further exploit our voices.”Denizen

“Readers will be profoundly moved by this remarkable meditation.”Publishers Weekly, starred review

“Tragic, funny, and relatable[, Searches] is by turns absurd and insightful, engaging with the ethics of algorithms, surveillance, and privacy in a meaningful way. . . . A must read.”Library Journal, starred review

“Vara’s essays are beautifully written and profoundly researched, but what sets them apart is their profound vulnerability. Her use of experimental forms . . . pushes the limits of the genre without ever compromising her circumspective, confessional approach. An original essay collection about loss, technology, morality, and identity.”Kirkus, starred review

“Vara humanizes the influence of technology in highly personal terms [and] projects what the future holds as tech oligarchs gain political influence. . . . Provocative, challenging, and concerning, Vara’s clever, eye-opening approach brings home the often uneasy confluence of individual desire, social benefits, and corporate ambition.” Booklist, starred review

“A book of essays in the original sense, which is to say that it is a book of experiments, of interrogations: of the internet, of form, of possibilities, of ourselves.”—LitHub, “Most Anticipated Books of 2025”

"Searches is that rare thing: a genuinely thrilling book that breaks open existing forms and structures to offer something entirely new. Vara brings the rigor of a reporter and the exhilarating impulses of an artist into this extraordinary, sui generis book: with wit, insight, tenderness, humility, and clear-eyed candor, she explores the wild frontiers of what our lives have already become. The stakes are high. The ride is terrifying and illuminating at once. This book will leave you changed and stay with you for good."—Leslie Jamison, author of Splinters: Another Kind of Love Story

"I cannot imagine a better guide through the infuriating, labyrinthine underworld of technology than Vauhini Vara. Searches is so many things—heart-stoppingly sad, a formal high-wire act, a wise and funny and thoughtful encyclopedia of our modern age—but most of all it is a book about human relationships: how imperfectly we made this thing that connects us, and how we might use this thing to re-meet ourselves and each other."— Carmen Maria Machado, author of In the Dream House

“What an original, expansive, epic achievement. I've been waiting for a follow-up to Vauhini Vara's magazine piece ‘Ghosts,’ where she introduced us to a new machine-based technology — a predecessor to ChatGPT — that had the potential to replace writers like herself. What she's delivered in Searches is a riveting, provocative and deeply personal exploration of our ambivalent relationship with technology that spans from our earliest history to the advent of the internet to the race to dominate artificial intelligence. This is a book that will challenge your notions of what it means to be human, investigating our quest for connection and understanding of our place in the world when technology is getting devilishly good at mimicking us. There is no one better to tell this story than Vauhini Vara, with her deeply engaging personal narratives, infused with curiosity and humor, who has grown up with the internet and sat in the front row as the captains of Big Tech brought us the technologies that now permeate our lives. This book doesn't lead you to a simple and automatic conclusion. In perhaps the most human of qualities, it will make you continue to question, to search.”— Cecilia Kang, co-author of An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook’s Battle for Domination and award-winning New York Times technology and policy reporter

“Searches picks up where Vauhini Vara’s impressive first novel, The Immortal King Rao, left off; this new book deepens, complicates, and amplifies her ongoing investigation into the nature of artificial intelligence, especially in relationship to the human body, mortality, sorrow, and grief. Blessedly free of cant or posture and extremely knowledgeable about (and acutely conscious of its complicity in) the networks it’s mapping, Searches is Vara’s best and most compelling book yet.”—David Shields, author of Reality Hunger

In Searches, the novelist Vauhini Vara gives us a thought-provoking exploration of our age of digital networks and AI. A seemingly omnipresent observer of this revolution, she takes us on a journey from middle-school chat rooms in 1990s Oklahoma, to an early, pre-OpenAI interview with Sam Altman, to her wary interactions with the then-new, not-yet-public AI model GPT-3 as she seeks to make sense of a youthful trauma that won’t go away. Searches defies simple, familiar narrative at every turn, rendering a compelling warning of how our technology both connects and commodifies us, molding our understanding of our world and ourselves.”­—David A. Price, author of Geniuses at War and The Pixar Touch

Author

© Brigid McAuliffe
Vauhini Vara has been a reporter and editor for The Atlantic, The New Yorker, and the New York Times Magazine, and is the prize-winning author of The Immortal King Rao and This is Salvaged. She lives in Fort Collins, Colorado. View titles by Vauhini Vara

Dear Librarians: A Letter from Vauhini Vara, Author of Searches

“Like a lot of authors, I grew up at the library. One of my first memories is of quietly reading at my local library in Prince Albert, Saskatchewan—I guess I was around four—when a pair of ladies saw me and asked if I was really reading the words or just looking at the pictures. I was reading, I told them.”

Read more
  • More Websites from
    Penguin Random House
  • Common Reads
  • Library Marketing